Common Core And The “National Sexuality Education Standards”

Stop Common CoreIn a previous article “What Exactly Is Common Core?” I went into some detail about what the Common Core Initiative is. In this article I will start to explain the “National Sexuality Education Standards”. Rather than go through the standards line by line, I found it a bit more interesting and informative to talk about how and what is being applied in today’s class room.

This is a hard subject to write on as it strikes up debate, more often than not, that revolves around emotion. It is also extremely hard to drudge up information as to what our children are being or are going to be taught. Since information on the Sexual Education Standards is scarce, hidden or removed from documentation and websites, I will rely heavily on what parents are seeing first hand and a document known as the “National Sexuality Education Standards”.

Let’s get started, I’m going to start by taking a closer look at the title of the document that I am using in this article, “National Sexuality Education Standards”.

  • National: Federal
  • Sexuality: Involvement or interest in sexual activity
  • Educational: Instructive or informative
  • Standards: Standards have to be measured so teasing will apply.

National Sexuality Education StandardsSo the “National Sexuality Education Standards” is a federal set of standards geared towards a child’s involvement or interest in sexual activity that the child will be tested on.

So what does this entail? Let’s have a look.
Note: According to the standards this will start at age five.

These standards are not intended to be implemented as a core subject like English and Math. Basically, don’t expect to see a class such as “Sex Ed” that you can opt out of. They will be fed into every other aspect of Common Core. On page 6 of the document you will find the following text,

Introduction and Background

“The National Sexuality Education Standards were further informed by the work of the CDC’s Health Education Curriculum Analysis Tool (HECAT)3; existing state and international education standards that include sexual health content; the Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Kindergarten – 12th Grade4; and the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics5, recently adopted by most states.”

Pay particular attention to the line that reads,

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics5”

Why in the world would the “National Sexuality Education Standards” have to consult with the “Common Core Standards” in English and Math? Answer: The Sexuality Education is being loaded into, between and around the Math and English curriculum. Let’s think about this, we know that schools are not going to put a bunch of 5 year old children into a Sex Ed class, at least not at first, so they are loading the current core curriculum with Sex Ed material. To further support this claim, people on the career path of being an educator are having modules added to prep them on how to teach Sex Ed. Yes, you heard it correctly, Math and English college students that are looking to become educators are learning how to teach Sex Ed. Just try to opt out of that.

Recently kids in a middle school had a mandatory assembly that they attended. What was the assembly? Answer: It was an assembly in support and provided by the LGBT – Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender. Of course parents were not notified that their children where required to attend this assembly. Regardless if you agree with what was presented to the children or not, the parents should have been notified of the content of the assembly in order to opt out or at least be prepared to answer questions that their children may have on the subject. I have an edited, for the sake of time, video of the assembly below.


Let’s shift gears and take a look at some of the standards put forth in this document.

By the End of 2nd Grade (Age 7), Students should be able to:

  • “Identify different kinds of family structures.”
  • “Demonstrate ways to show respect for different types of families.”
  • “Describe differences and similarities in how boys and girls may be expected to act.”
  • “Provide examples of how friends, family, media, society and culture influence ways in which boys and girls think they should act.”

By the End of 5nd Grade (Age 10),

  • “Identify medically-accurate information and resources about puberty and personal hygiene.”
  • “Define sexual orientation as the romantic attraction of an individual to someone of the same gender or different gender.”

I love how they lump sexual orientation and gender together, effectively making them the same. Want to confuse a child, they are on the right path. I find the ordering of the last objective to be interesting. Notice how “same gender” is before “different gender“. I know this is splitting hairs but you can trust that there is a method to the madness. It seems that the standard has a strong emphasis on homosexuality. This is not going to make it easy on parents with religious beliefs as well as the potential to compromise morality. How in the world can a parent opt out of the curriculum if it is being implemented in this manner? For example?

In Denmark, Wisconsin Dr. Pesta was giving a speech on Common Core. When he reached a point where he was talking about the “National Sexuality Education Standards” a teacher interrupted Dr. Pesta and stood up holding a little red card along with several parents in the audience. What was the little red card? Answer: It was a pledge between the school and the student agreeing to defend and support homosexual marriage and the lifestyle every year they are a student of that school. Did I mention that the students that signed and turned in this pledge where 2nd graders? Parents would have never found out if it wasn’t for a couple of the students that dumped the cards into their backpacks rather than turning them in as they were supposed to.

Moving on. Just how is this standard going to be implemented? Let’s take a look,

Administering Sexuality Standards

  • “Instruction by qualified sexuality education teachers is essential for student achievement.”
  • “Students need opportunities to engage in cooperative and active learning strategies…”
  • “Sufficient time must be allocated for students to practice skills relating to sexuality education.”
  • “…Students need multiple opportunities and a variety of assessment strategies to determine their achievement of the sexuality education standards and performance.”

Earlier I stated that modules are being introduced for people pursuing a career in education. Line one is the reason why they implemented the modules. The second line is interesting as it calls for engaging in “cooperative” and “active” strategies with the next line calling for “practice”. I wonder what the “variety of assessments” to measure the child’s “achievement” in the “National Sexuality Education Standards” are? What do they mean by active and cooperative? Well, we know that the Sexuality Education will be included and presented alongside the core courses, that is unfortunately all that I have been able to find at this time.Middle School Poster

So what does this look like from within a school. Here is a poster displayed in a Shawnee, Kansas middle school, at the front of the class, for all the children to read. What does the poster say? I will tell you what it does not say. It leaves no distinction between any of the listed and supposed sexual acts. It does not state that talking will not cause disease or pregnancy while others will, it effectively lumps them all together as being the same. This is just dangerous in my opinion. At least they could have gotten the spelling of “Caressing” correct and not listed talking twice.

A father, after his daughter showed him a picture she took of the poster, wrote the school about the inappropriateness of the poster. The school responded with the following,

“The poster that you reference is actually part of our middle school health and science material, and so it is a part of our district approved curriculum.”

“The curriculum it is a part of, it aligns with national standards around those topics, and it’s part of our curriculum in the school district.”

“Hocker Grove Middle School Spokeswoman Leigh Anne Neal, (Shawnee, KS)”

Is there any question as to what standards the spokeswoman is referring to? I think not, it is the “The National Sexuality Education Standards”. The above poster, video and stories are just a few examples showing the implementation of the Sexuality Standards in our children’s schools.

My next article will be on the “Common Core Standards – Data Collection and Mining”. There is so much to cover with Common Core that it is going to take several ongoing articles just to get a full understanding of the current standards and even more articles in an effort to keep all the information up to date.

Share with others,

Please share this series of article, we need to work together to stop Common Core. Our plans are to educate and inform as many people as possible, untimely repealing the Common Core Initiative. I personally, being from AZ, plan to petition the state of AZ to remove the Common Core Initiative. We can win this, one person at a time, one school at a time and one state at a time but it will take some effort.

What is Common Core Series:

What Exactly Is Common Core?
What is Common Core English All About?
What Is Common Core Math All About?
Common Core And The “National Sexuality Education Standards”
Common Core Standards – Data Collection and Mining
Common Core – What can I do? (Coming Soon)


CCSS Parent Opt Out Form
Opt Out of CCSS Letter (WORD DOCX Format)
Opt Out of CCSS Letter (Adobe PDF Format)


Common Core References
National Sexuality Education Standards
Info/Progress Chart
Promoting Grit, Tenacity, and Perseverance


Johnathan Carroll


Please allow me to introduce myself, My name is Johnathan W. Carroll a 12 year resident of Tucson, Arizona. I am a registered Republican but consider myself a Libertarian / Constitutionalist. I am an activist so you may see me on a corner supporting Grassroot political activity. I am the founder of “TechSoft Systems“, providing “IT” services to local and remote clients, Founder of “The Free Republic” and the cofounder of “Prevent Common Core“. I have several interests ranging from music and movies to firearms, technology and higher learning. The most significant interests, that spawned my passion and ultimately brought to reality, “Prevent Common Core“, are my fight for Liberty and Freedom, my inexorable thirst for knowledge and most important my love for my family. Click HERE for more about me.

View all posts by

3 thoughts on “Common Core And The “National Sexuality Education Standards”

  1. It would be nice if you could distinguish between the ideas of “national standards” (i.e., a list of topics) and “district-approved curriculum” (i.e., the way the local schools have decided to present those topics in detail). You are mixing them up and blaming the Common Core list for the decisions made the district.

    Also, your use of propaganda techniques and logical fallacies to create fear and distrust is impressive but disappointing.

    This is not an “article” but a manipulative and factually inaccurate opinion essay.

  2. @Tj
    I would like to thank you for your comment.

    The National Sexuality Education Standards are written in a manner that does not leave a lot of room for interpretation. The schools are implementing the National Standards as best they can in accordance with the standards presented to them. In a nutshell, If the standard where not written as they are the problem would not exist therefore the standards, implementation and interpretation are open for debate as a whole. Separating the standards from what is happening in reality would only present part of the cause of the problem leaving out the effect of what is truly happening in our schools.

    I fail to see the propaganda, what I have stated and the examples given are in fact happening. This is not what I would consider propaganda. For example, if the standards were not in place would the situations presented in this article be happening across the US? NO.

    You can believe me when I say, “I wish that Prevent Common Core never existed”. Simply put, if it was not for what CC is doing to our children we would not be here trying to help. Prevent Common Core is not something that Mark and I dreamed up to pump propaganda. Prevent Common Core was created out of necessity to present the standards and their implementation as they are being applied to our schools and children. You can further believe that I would prefer to be out enjoying life rather than talking about Federal overreach into our children’s future at “Prevent Common Core”.

    Thank you

  3. When people start questioning why so much inappropriate sexual content and subject matter is included in these Common Core curriculum, all they need do is visit Communist thinkers like Vladimir Lenin, who once said: “The best revolutionary is a YOUTH DEVOID OF MORALS.” His word being law in Communist organizations, all members WORK SECRETLY TO MAKE YOUNG PEOPLE OF BOTH SEXES ***ANTI-SOCIAL AND IMMORAL***. [emphasis mine] Children up to teen-age are taught to rebel against the discipline of the home. Parents are represented to their children as old-fashioned. Parental authority is scoffed at. The subverters argue that parents have lied to their children since they were old enough to listen, regarding Santa Claus and where babies come from. The subversives claims parents are the victims of reactionary teachings and capitalistic exploitation. The child is encouraged to educate the parents in regard to modern and progressive ideas. They are warned that, for their own good, they must refuse to be dominated or disciplined by their parents. The purpose of this subversive campaign is to destroy the sanctity, and unity, of the home which is the foundation upon which our civilization is founded.

    SOURCE: PAWNS IN THE GAME, page 126, by William Guy Carr, 1958

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *